Joe McDonnell has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/9860 )

Change subject: IMPALA-6769: Avoid pulling incoherent Hadoop dependencies.
......................................................................


Patch Set 1: Code-Review+2

(2 comments)

This makes sense to me. Hive LLAP should not impact our Java code.

One question I have: Is there a way to unify/standardize the 
exclusions/inclusions? We have something separate for thrift. Do we want 
something similar for Parquet? It doesn't need to happen in this code change, 
but if there is a way to put them all in one place, that would be good.

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9860/1//COMMIT_MSG
Commit Message:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9860/1//COMMIT_MSG@16
PS1, Line 16: sentsentry.hbase
Nit: Is this supposed to be "sentry,hbase"?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9860/1/fe/pom.xml
File fe/pom.xml:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9860/1/fe/pom.xml@720
PS1, Line 720:           <groupId>org.apache.parquet</groupId>
             :           <artifactId>parquet-hadoop-bundle</artifactId>
             :           <version>${parquet.version}</version>
Does it make sense to do something similar for the parquet dependency?



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/9860
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: Impala-ASF
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ie4b38c4fc5e30ec1464586282f08e3b82f30d7bd
Gerrit-Change-Number: 9860
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Philip Zeyliger <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Impala Public Jenkins
Gerrit-Reviewer: Joe McDonnell <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Philip Zeyliger <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2018 01:28:54 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to