Fang-Yu Rao has posted comments on this change. ( http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/23209 )
Change subject: IMPALA-13767: Do not treat CTEs as names of actual tables ...................................................................... Patch Set 4: (6 comments) I have addressed most of Steve's comments on patch set 3. Let me know if there are addition suggestions. Thanks very much for the help! http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/23209/3/java/calcite-planner/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/calcite/service/CalciteMetadataHandler.java File java/calcite-planner/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/calcite/service/CalciteMetadataHandler.java: http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/23209/3/java/calcite-planner/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/calcite/service/CalciteMetadataHandler.java@191 PS3, Line 191: new NoopAuthorizationFactory(), null); > > I have mixed feelings on that because a Stack seems more natural with "re Done http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/23209/3/java/calcite-planner/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/calcite/service/CalciteMetadataHandler.java@194 PS3, Line 194: /** > Ack Done http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/23209/3/java/calcite-planner/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/calcite/service/CalciteMetadataHandler.java@202 PS3, Line 202: // Error condition for now. Complex tables are not yet supported > Yes. It is a good idea. It may be enough for us to put only "SqlWith" nodes Done http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/23209/3/java/calcite-planner/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/calcite/service/CalciteMetadataHandler.java@211 PS3, Line 211: // This map associates each SqlWith node with the TableName's registered by its > I can see that a TableName object contains a lot of fields that are not > really needed. We only need the database name and the table name for the > visited SqlWithItem in our case. I could make the change accordingly if my > understanding is correct. I did not make this change in patch set 4. If we really want to save some space in the memory, I could do this in the next patch. http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/23209/3/java/calcite-planner/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/calcite/service/CalciteMetadataHandler.java@218 PS3, Line 218: > Thanks Steve! Yeah. Using computeIfAbsent() would make the code much more c Done http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/23209/3/java/calcite-planner/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/calcite/service/CalciteMetadataHandler.java@292 PS3, Line 292: > Yes. I will make the corresponding change in the next patch. Done -- To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/23209 To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings Gerrit-Project: Impala-ASF Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: I3f51af42d64cdcff3c26ad5a96c7f53ebef431b3 Gerrit-Change-Number: 23209 Gerrit-PatchSet: 4 Gerrit-Owner: Fang-Yu Rao <fangyu....@cloudera.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Aman Sinha <amsi...@cloudera.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Fang-Yu Rao <fangyu....@cloudera.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Impala Public Jenkins <impala-public-jenk...@cloudera.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Joe McDonnell <joemcdonn...@cloudera.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Michael Smith <michael.sm...@cloudera.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Riza Suminto <riza.sumi...@cloudera.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Steve Carlin <scar...@cloudera.com> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2025 22:00:11 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
