Vuk Ercegovac has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/10587 )

Change subject: IMPALA-6994:Avoid reloading a table's HMS data for file-only 
operations
......................................................................


Patch Set 2:

(8 comments)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/10587/2//COMMIT_MSG
Commit Message:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/10587/2//COMMIT_MSG@7
PS2, Line 7: IMPALA-6994:Avoid reloading a table's HMS data for file-only 
operations
nit: add a space


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/10587/2//COMMIT_MSG@9
PS2, Line 9:
remove the description block's indent


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/10587/2//COMMIT_MSG@10
PS2, Line 10: unecessary
nit: check spelling and remove extra spaces.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/10587/2//COMMIT_MSG@9
PS2, Line 9: unpartitioned HDFS table,
           :   or to an existing partition
simplify to just HDFS table, or is there some case that's being excluded?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/10587/2//COMMIT_MSG@14
PS2, Line 14: This extra call to HMS introduces a point of failure, we need to 
handle
            :   for error scenario when Hive MetaStore crashes
So is this change an optimization, a correctness/robustness fix, or both? Also, 
I don't understand the point about a failure-- pls add an example with a 
sequence of steps that currently leads to an error. Can add such an example to 
the jira.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/10587/2//COMMIT_MSG@15
PS2, Line 15: This change removes the
            :   extra call to Hive Meta Store for the case when a row is 
inserted to an
            :   existing partition in HDFS table or when a row is added to 
unpartitioned
            :   table. Thus, an optimization as it reduces the call to Hive 
Meta Store
            :   during Update of Catalog.
lots of redundancy here with the prev. paragraph-- pls condense or remove.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/10587/2//COMMIT_MSG@21
PS2, Line 21:   Testing: Ran core test without failure.
Is there any new scenario that you want to test for this change? If existing 
tests cover it, is there any way to assert that this change is operating as 
expected?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/10587/2/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/catalog/HdfsTable.java
File fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/catalog/HdfsTable.java:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/10587/2/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/catalog/HdfsTable.java@1252
PS2, Line 1252: nonewPartitionHint
needs a comment.



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/10587
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: Impala-ASF
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I331bb0371fde287f43a85b025b4f98cb45f3eb3c
Gerrit-Change-Number: 10587
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: Pranay Singh
Gerrit-Reviewer: Bharath Vissapragada <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Vuk Ercegovac <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 16:19:48 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to