Quanlong Huang has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/24592 )

Change subject: IMPALA-15189: Support HBO for SortNode cardinality
......................................................................


Patch Set 12:

(6 comments)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/24592/11/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/planner/ExchangeNode.java
File fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/planner/ExchangeNode.java:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/24592/11/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/planner/ExchangeNode.java@441
PS11, Line 441:
> I kinda feel like something is wrong here, overriding this.
That's a good point. It's a bit messy due to maintaining the literal meaning of 
isCardinalityPreserving(). Instead, we should rename it to 
ignoredInHboCardKey(). Then ExchangeNode can always return true in it.

PS12 removed these overrides.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/24592/4/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/planner/JoinNode.java
File fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/planner/JoinNode.java:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/24592/4/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/planner/JoinNode.java@1096
PS4, Line 1096:   }
> Should we put this and subtreeHasJoin in PlanNode?  I think it's a little a
It's removed in later patch sets.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/24592/11/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/planner/SortNode.java
File fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/planner/SortNode.java:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/24592/11/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/planner/SortNode.java@269
PS11, Line 269:     PlanNode baseChild = getChild(0);
> Nit: heh, you were the one who taught me this:  Maybe change this to
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/24592/11/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/planner/SortNode.java@285
PS11, Line 285:     }
> Nit: this preconditions should be above the "if" clause at line 282
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/24592/11/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/planner/SortNode.java@321
PS11, Line 321:       if (mergeParent_ instanceof ExchangeNode) {
> If the value changes only because its mutated, can we just keep the origina
We keep the original offset (originalOffset_) and we can use it here. But 
keeping and using the original limit will be tricky since getSortLimit() could 
return limitWithTies_ instead of limit_. We will still need a check like 
"mergeParent_ instanceof ExchangeNode" so not reducing the lines of changes.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/24592/11/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/planner/SortNode.java@474
PS11, Line 474:     }
> Nit and suggestion:
Done



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/24592
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: Impala-ASF
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ib829887a91593bee124d56e661e714575fe3be97
Gerrit-Change-Number: 24592
Gerrit-PatchSet: 12
Gerrit-Owner: Quanlong Huang <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Aleksandr Efimov <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Impala Public Jenkins <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Quanlong Huang <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Steve Carlin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 13:18:13 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to