Bikramjeet Vig has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/12401 )

Change subject: IMPALA-8064: Improve observability of wait times for runtime 
filters
......................................................................


Patch Set 1:

(2 comments)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/12401/1/be/src/exec/scan-node.cc
File be/src/exec/scan-node.cc:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/12401/1/be/src/exec/scan-node.cc@179
PS1, Line 179: max_wait_time = max(max_wait_time, ctx.filter->time_elapsed());
> If I understand it correctly, the point of these changes is to reflect the
Thanks for the context Michael. Based on this it definitely seems like a good 
idea to add another time metric to the profile, and perhaps re-word the 
infoString to make it explicitly clear what each means. Naming it to something 
like "Max runtime filter wait time:" so that it directly relates to the query 
options as well, making it abundantly clear.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/12401/1/be/src/runtime/runtime-filter.h
File be/src/runtime/runtime-filter.h:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/12401/1/be/src/runtime/runtime-filter.h@89
PS1, Line 89: time_elapsed
you can probably replace arrival_delay() with this method and rename it to 
something like wait_time_ms(). The "Returns 0 if filter has not yet arrived" 
part in arrival_delay() is not used anywhere anyways.



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/12401
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: Impala-ASF
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I28fd45e75c773bc01d424f5a179ae186ee9b7469
Gerrit-Change-Number: 12401
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Pooja Nilangekar <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Bikramjeet Vig <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Impala Public Jenkins <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Michael Ho <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Pooja Nilangekar <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2019 18:13:31 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to