Norbert Luksa has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/15103 )

Change subject: IMPALA-9324: Correctly handle ORC UNION type in scanner
......................................................................


Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1

(3 comments)

Left some minor comments, but it LGTM.

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/15103/1/be/src/exec/hdfs-orc-scanner.cc
File be/src/exec/hdfs-orc-scanner.cc:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/15103/1/be/src/exec/hdfs-orc-scanner.cc@203
PS1, Line 203:           "Root of the selected type returned by the ORC lib is 
not STRUCT: $0. "
nit: this could be unified with orc-metadata-utils.cc:28, would it make sense 
to add an error code for this case as well?

Or are both checks necessary?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/15103/1/testdata/workloads/functional-query/queries/DataErrorsTest/orc-type-checks.test
File 
testdata/workloads/functional-query/queries/DataErrorsTest/orc-type-checks.test:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/15103/1/testdata/workloads/functional-query/queries/DataErrorsTest/orc-type-checks.test@160
PS1, Line 160: Note that before
             : # IMPALA-9324 this query will crash.
nit: I think this comment here is not necessary.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/15103/1/testdata/workloads/functional-query/queries/DataErrorsTest/orc-type-checks.test@172
PS1, Line 172: has an incompatible ORC schema for column 
'$DATABASE.ill_complextypes.u',
Just a question: Isn't the fie is also part of the error msg? Can they be 
omitted?



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/15103
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: Impala-ASF
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I452d27b4e281eada00b62ac58af773a3479163ec
Gerrit-Change-Number: 15103
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Quanlong Huang <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Impala Public Jenkins <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Norbert Luksa <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:50:26 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to