Riza Suminto has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/17195 )

Change subject: IMPALA-10584: Defer advancing read page when reservation is 
tight.
......................................................................


Patch Set 4:

(2 comments)

Patch set 4 submitted.

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/17195/3/be/src/runtime/buffered-tuple-stream-test.cc
File be/src/runtime/buffered-tuple-stream-test.cc:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/17195/3/be/src/runtime/buffered-tuple-stream-test.cc@1237
PS3, Line 1237: TEST_F(SimpleTupleStreamTest, UnpinReadPage) {
> It is possible to reproduce the bug with some changes in this test?
Added DeferAdvancingReadPage to test this corner case.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/17195/3/be/src/runtime/buffered-tuple-stream.cc
File be/src/runtime/buffered-tuple-stream.cc:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/17195/3/be/src/runtime/buffered-tuple-stream.cc@723
PS3, Line 723:
> Does this assume the size of the read page is default_page_len_? Should we
That is a good point, thanks!
However, replacing it with read_it_.read_page_->len() caught this DCHECK 
failure: "buffer-pool.cc:93] Check failed: is_open()".
I think this because the the page handle has been closed in 
AttachBufferToBatch().
I made a work around by memorizing the page len in last_attached_page_len_ 
variable.



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/17195
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: Impala-ASF
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I16137b6e423f190f60c3115a06ccd0f77e9f585a
Gerrit-Change-Number: 17195
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: Riza Suminto <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Bikramjeet Vig <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Impala Public Jenkins <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Joe McDonnell <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Quanlong Huang <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Riza Suminto <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 19:07:49 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to