Alex Behm has posted comments on this change. Change subject: IMPALA-4285/IMPALA-4286: Fixes for Parquet scanner with MT_DOP > 0. ......................................................................
Patch Set 4: (6 comments) http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/4767/4//COMMIT_MSG Commit Message: Line 17: HdfsScanNodeMt::GetNext(). > why do we have this check in HdfsScanNodeBase::Open() in the first place? Removed the short-circuit in Open() instead. http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/4767/4/be/src/exec/hdfs-scan-node-mt.cc File be/src/exec/hdfs-scan-node-mt.cc: PS4, Line 71: , > did you mean to say more or make it a period? I removed the short-circuit in Open() instead. Line 72: if (file_descs_.empty()) { > this is okay, but why can't we just delete the equivalent check in HdfsScan No, removed it. http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/4767/4/be/src/exec/hdfs-scanner.cc File be/src/exec/hdfs-scanner.cc: PS4, Line 230: row > "row" seems misleading Not relevant anymore, I also removed the conjunct eval. Tests passed. PS4, Line 230: an > and Done Line 236: // Set remaining tuples in row. > misleading comment Done -- To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/4767 To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: I79c0f6fd2aeb4bc6fa5f87219a485194fef2db1b Gerrit-PatchSet: 4 Gerrit-Project: Impala-ASF Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Owner: Alex Behm <[email protected]> Gerrit-Reviewer: Alex Behm <[email protected]> Gerrit-Reviewer: Dan Hecht <[email protected]> Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
