Taras Bobrovytsky has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/8309 )

Change subject: IMPALA-5019: Decimal V2 addition
......................................................................


Patch Set 3:

(5 comments)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8309/3/be/src/runtime/decimal-value.inline.h
File be/src/runtime/decimal-value.inline.h:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8309/3/be/src/runtime/decimal-value.inline.h@179
PS3, Line 179:     int128_t& x_left, int128_t& x_right, int128_t& y_left, 
int128_t& y_right) {
> Use pointers for output arguments: https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppg
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8309/3/be/src/runtime/decimal-value.inline.h@214
PS3, Line 214: right_overflow
> carry_to_left might be a better name? Since the intent is to carry this int
Agreed, changed.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8309/3/be/src/runtime/decimal-value.inline.h@243
PS3, Line 243: inline int128_t SubtractLarge(int128_t x, int x_scale, int128_t 
y, int y_scale,
> What do you think about make it so that this always computes x - y, and mak
The way it is currently implemented, I don't see an advantage in doing that. We 
do not use the subtraction operation in this function, we still add x and y 
together.

Are you suggesting to rewrite it, so that x and y are both expected to be 
positive and we will be doing x - y here? It's not quite clear to me which case 
would be eliminated if we rewrite it that way. (Both cases on line 264 would 
still need to be present)


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8309/2/be/src/runtime/decimal-value.inline.h
File be/src/runtime/decimal-value.inline.h:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8309/2/be/src/runtime/decimal-value.inline.h@305
PS2, Line 305:     RESULT_T y = 0;
> Ah ok. I wonder if renaming the variable would make it clearer. Something l
Ranamed to result_scale_decrease


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8309/2/be/src/runtime/decimal-value.inline.h@310
PS2, Line 310:   }
> Thanks. I still think something is missing in the AdjustToSameScale() name
Modified the comment of AdjustToSameScale() slightly. I was  debating changing 
the name to AdjustToMaxScale(), but that might be confusing (because max scale 
is 38)).



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/8309
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: Impala-ASF
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I401049c56d910eb1546a178c909c923b01239336
Gerrit-Change-Number: 8309
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: Taras Bobrovytsky <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Michael Ho <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Taras Bobrovytsky <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Tim Armstrong <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Zach Amsden <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2017 01:43:37 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to