HTHou commented on a change in pull request #2601: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/2601#discussion_r567650954
########## File path: docs/UserGuide/Comparison/TSDB-Comparison.md ########## @@ -327,58 +346,29 @@ We provide a benchmarking tool, called IoTDB-benchamrk (https://github.com/thula it supports IoTDB, InfluxDB, KairosDB, TimescaleDB, OpenTSDB. We have a [article](https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.08304) for comparing these systems using the benchmark tool. When we publish the article, IoTDB just entered Apache incubator, so we deleted the performance of IoTDB in that article. But after comparison, some results are presented here. -- **IoTDB: 0.8.0**. (notice: **IoTDB v0.9 outperforms than v0.8**, the result will be updated once experiments on v0.9 are finished) -- InfluxDB: 1.5.1. -- OpenTSDB: 2.3.1 (HBase 1.2.8) -- KairosDB: 1.2.1 (Cassandra 3.11.3) -- TimescaleDB: 1.0.0 (PostgreSQL 10.5) - All TSDB run on the same server one by one. - For InfluxDB, we set the cache-max-memory-size and max-series-perbase as unlimited (otherwise it will be timeout quickly) Review comment: ```suggestion - For InfluxDB, we set the cache-max-memory-size and the max-series-perbase as unlimited (otherwise it will be timeout quickly). ``` ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
