LingweiKuang opened a new issue, #13725: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/issues/13725
### Search before asking - [X] I searched in the [issues](https://github.com/apache/iotdb/issues) and found nothing similar. ### Version +-------+---------+ |Version|BuildInfo | +-------+---------+ | 1.3.2| aa0ff4a | +-------+---------+ ### Describe the bug and provide the minimal reproduce step ``` DROP DATABASE root.db0 CREATE DATABASE root.db0 INSERT INTO root.db0(t1) VALUES (1) INSERT INTO root.db0(timestamp, t1) VALUES (13453556, 2) INSERT INTO root.db0(timestamp, t1) VALUES (1519786882, 3) # query 1 SELECT t1 FROM root.db0 WHERE !(2 + 50) SELECT t1 FROM root.db0 WHERE !(2 / 50) # query 2 SELECT t1 FROM root.db0 WHERE !100 ``` ### What did you expect to see? Query 1 and Query 2 should return the same error message. ### What did you see instead? Query 1 returns `Msg: 305: [INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR(305)] Exception occurred: "SELECT t1 FROM root.db0 WHERE !(2 + 50)". executeStatement failed. Unsupported expression type: ADDITION` error. Query 2 returns `Msg: 701: Invalid input expression data type. expression: 100, actual data type: INT64, expected data type(s): [BOOLEAN].` error. ### Anything else? Dear IoTDB team, I believe the 305 internal error returned by Query 1 should be classified as a logical bug, as it may lead to user misunderstanding.In Query 1, besides addition, other binary arithmetic operators also exhibit the same vulnerability. ### Are you willing to submit a PR? - [ ] I'm willing to submit a PR! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
