Caideyipi opened a new pull request, #17732:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/17732

   ## Description
   
     This PR fixes UDF jar metadata handling in `UDFInfo` when multiple UDFs 
share the same jar.
   
     ### Background
   
     `UDFInfo` previously tracked uploaded jars only with `jarName -> md5`. 
When a UDF was dropped, the jar metadata was
     removed immediately. This breaks the case where multiple UDFs reference 
the same jar:
     - dropping one UDF can make ConfigNode think the shared jar no longer 
exists
     - later validation may no longer detect conflicting MD5 values for the 
same jar name
     - after snapshot load, jar metadata is restored but shared-jar reference 
state is not rebuilt, so the same issue can
     reappear after restart
   
     ### Changes
   
     This PR introduces reference counting for shared UDF jars in `UDFInfo`.
     - add `existedJarToReferenceCount` to track how many UDFs are using each 
jar
     - update UDF creation flow to increase jar reference count instead of only 
recording MD5
     - update UDF drop flow to remove jar metadata only when the last reference 
is removed
     - rebuild jar metadata and reference counts from the UDF table after 
loading a snapshot
   
     This keeps shared jar metadata consistent across normal create/drop 
operations and snapshot recovery.
   
     ### Tests
   
     Updated `UDFInfoTest` to cover the shared-jar cases:
     - dropping one UDF does not remove jar metadata if another UDF still 
references the same jar
     - validation still rejects the same jar name with a different MD5 after 
one reference is dropped
     - snapshot load rebuilds shared-jar metadata correctly, and subsequent 
drop behavior remains correct
   
   <!--
   In each section, please describe design decisions made, including:
    - Choice of algorithms
    - Behavioral aspects. What configuration values are acceptable? How are 
corner cases and error 
       conditions handled, such as when there are insufficient resources?
    - Class organization and design (how the logic is split between classes, 
inheritance, composition, 
       design patterns)
    - Method organization and design (how the logic is split between methods, 
parameters and return types)
    - Naming (class, method, API, configuration, HTTP endpoint, names of 
emitted metrics)
   -->
   
   
   <!-- It's good to describe an alternative design (or mention an alternative 
name) for every design 
   (or naming) decision point and compare the alternatives with the designs 
that you've implemented 
   (or the names you've chosen) to highlight the advantages of the chosen 
designs and names. -->
   
   <!-- If there was a discussion of the design of the feature implemented in 
this PR elsewhere 
   (e. g. a "Proposal" issue, any other issue, or a thread in the development 
mailing list), 
   link to that discussion from this PR description and explain what have 
changed in your final design 
   compared to your original proposal or the consensus version in the end of 
the discussion. 
   If something hasn't changed since the original discussion, you can omit a 
detailed discussion of 
   those aspects of the design here, perhaps apart from brief mentioning for 
the sake of readability 
   of this PR description. -->
   
   <!-- Some of the aspects mentioned above may be omitted for simple and small 
changes. -->
   
   <hr>
   
   This PR has:
   - [ ] been self-reviewed.
       - [ ] concurrent read
       - [ ] concurrent write
       - [ ] concurrent read and write 
   - [ ] added documentation for new or modified features or behaviors.
   - [ ] added Javadocs for most classes and all non-trivial methods. 
   - [ ] added or updated version, __license__, or notice information
   - [ ] added comments explaining the "why" and the intent of the code 
wherever would not be obvious 
     for an unfamiliar reader.
   - [ ] added unit tests or modified existing tests to cover new code paths, 
ensuring the threshold 
     for code coverage.
   - [ ] added integration tests.
   - [ ] been tested in a test IoTDB cluster.
   
   <!-- Check the items by putting "x" in the brackets for the done things. Not 
all of these items 
   apply to every PR. Remove the items which are not done or not relevant to 
the PR. None of the items 
   from the checklist above are strictly necessary, but it would be very 
helpful if you at least 
   self-review the PR. -->
   
   <hr>
   
   ##### Key changed/added classes (or packages if there are too many classes) 
in this PR
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to