Mike Percy has posted comments on this change.

Change subject: make election timeout jitter more aggressive
......................................................................


Patch Set 1:

(1 comment)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/3828/1//COMMIT_MSG
Commit Message:

Line 7: make election timeout jitter more aggressive
> yea, but the jitter is only aggressive due to the backoff being more aggres
I agree with Todd, backoff cap avoids insane exponential backoffs. It seems 
like the jitter is what we are really worried about here. And TBH I'm not 
convinced this is the problem. Although I'd support wider jitter variance.

On a sort of side note, I tried to add a generic exponential backoff helper a 
long time ago in https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/979/ ... maybe we should 
partially resurrect that patch and work on ensuring that we have a single 
exponential backoff function that is parameterized and flexible enough to 
handle all situations.


-- 
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/3828
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I2c9dad820c2b7d4bc4b9e791b78222559cdf63c8
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Project: kudu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Dan Burkert <d...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Adar Dembo <a...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Dan Burkert <d...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins
Gerrit-Reviewer: Mike Percy <mpe...@apache.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Todd Lipcon <t...@apache.org>
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to