Mike Percy has posted comments on this change.

Change subject: KUDU-1330: Add a tool to unsafely recover from loss of majority 
replicas
......................................................................


Patch Set 12:

(1 comment)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/6066/11/src/kudu/consensus/raft_consensus_state.cc
File src/kudu/consensus/raft_consensus_state.cc:

PS11, Line 248:       config_to_commit.SerializeAsString())
> great catch, yeah.. but how can we let the unsafe config go through this eq
I think the code in rev 12 is correct. I am a little confused by this comment, 
can you clarify your question? If the question is how do we perform validation, 
in my opinion the answer is that we don't in the case of unsafe pending config 
changes. This is a safety check that is violated by unsafe config change (and 
that is by design).


-- 
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/6066
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I908d8c981df74d56dbd034e72001d379fb314700
Gerrit-PatchSet: 12
Gerrit-Project: kudu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Dinesh Bhat <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: David Ribeiro Alves <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Dinesh Bhat <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins
Gerrit-Reviewer: Mike Percy <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Tidy Bot
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to