Hao Hao has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/6755 )

Change subject: KUDU-1957: Clarify web UI redaction in --redact flag help
......................................................................


Patch Set 6:

> > > Yah, this is basically what I'm thinking.  It seems highly
 > > suspicious to return an error containing user data across the
 > wire.
 > >  DDL ops are a special case; we don't consider table schemas or
 > > even partition schemas to be sensitive.  Given that, I'm
 > personally
 > > fine ignoring the edge-case of error messages in the flag name.
 > >
 > > Alright, I can live with this.
 > >
 > > Hao, you may want to solicit Todd's opinion too so there's even
 > > less chance of someone asking for a rework of your patch again
 > (the
 > > way I did, sorry about that!).
 >
 > No problem at all! Thanks for giving all the suggestions.
 >
 > @Dan, I am not quite sure, but look at partition.cc, we are
 > redacting key value in the return error messages. Will that
 > eventually be part of the error messages displayed?

Though I want to state that I am good with not reverting the definition of 
--redact and just state it clear in help that 'log' also contains error 
messages.


--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/6755
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: kudu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I32fe0c4e65f22d6f9f3d188018b119f07300e26f
Gerrit-Change-Number: 6755
Gerrit-PatchSet: 6
Gerrit-Owner: Hao Hao <hao....@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Adar Dembo <a...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Dan Burkert <danburk...@apache.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Hao Hao <hao....@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins
Gerrit-Reviewer: Todd Lipcon <t...@apache.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 01:23:27 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No

Reply via email to