Will Berkeley has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/11498 )

Change subject: [tools] ksck checksums: Add KsckChecksummer class
......................................................................


Patch Set 8:

(3 comments)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11498/8/src/kudu/tools/ksck_checksum.h
File src/kudu/tools/ksck_checksum.h:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11498/8/src/kudu/tools/ksck_checksum.h@176
PS8, Line 176:   ~TabletServerChecksumCallbacks() = default;
> nit: it would be nice to add a comment like the following:
True, but this class gets deleted in the follow-up :)


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11498/6/src/kudu/tools/ksck_checksum.cc
File src/kudu/tools/ksck_checksum.cc:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11498/6/src/kudu/tools/ksck_checksum.cc@372
PS6, Line 372: if (queue->BlockingGet(&table_tablet))
> Right, so my question was whether it makes sense to continue the outer for(
Yeah, it doesn't matter at all because this part changes completely in the 
follow-up :)


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11498/8/src/kudu/tools/ksck_checksum.cc
File src/kudu/tools/ksck_checksum.cc:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11498/8/src/kudu/tools/ksck_checksum.cc@205
PS8, Line 205:
> nit: this extra space is not needed
Done



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/11498
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: kudu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I2016936eaa26fd6b499783e7d5d8f404816b37fa
Gerrit-Change-Number: 11498
Gerrit-PatchSet: 8
Gerrit-Owner: Will Berkeley <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alexey Serbin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Andrew Wong <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Attila Bukor <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Grant Henke <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins
Gerrit-Reviewer: Tidy Bot
Gerrit-Reviewer: Todd Lipcon <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Will Berkeley <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 05:11:19 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to