Bankim Bhavsar has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/15539 )

Change subject: bitmap: faster implementation of iteration over a bitmap
......................................................................


Patch Set 1:

(8 comments)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/15539/1/src/kudu/util/bitmap-inl.h
File src/kudu/util/bitmap-inl.h:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/15539/1/src/kudu/util/bitmap-inl.h@17
PS1, Line 17: #pragma once
Curious why not implement these functions in existing bitmap.h?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/15539/1/src/kudu/util/bitmap-inl.h@30
PS1, Line 30: int64_t
Why not uint64_t here?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/15539/1/src/kudu/util/bitmap-inl.h@59
PS1, Line 59: break;
just return here instead?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/15539/1/src/kudu/util/bitmap-test.cc
File src/kudu/util/bitmap-test.cc:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/15539/1/src/kudu/util/bitmap-test.cc@37
PS1, Line 37: &
Nit: Just capture result by reference.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/15539/1/src/kudu/util/bitmap-test.cc@87
PS1, Line 87: set
Is ordered set necessary?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/15539/1/src/kudu/util/bitmap-test.cc@109
PS1, Line 109: const
Nit: constexpr


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/15539/1/src/kudu/util/bitmap-test.cc@110
PS1, Line 110: const
constexpr


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/15539/1/src/kudu/util/bitmap-test.cc@118
PS1, Line 118: &
Only sum by reference



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/15539
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: kudu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ibe772a7dd92faf9f99115148ad4cc7df542d1c76
Gerrit-Change-Number: 15539
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Todd Lipcon <t...@apache.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Adar Dembo <a...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Bankim Bhavsar <ban...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins (120)
Gerrit-Reviewer: Tidy Bot (241)
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 00:43:32 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to