KeDeng has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/18945 )

Change subject: KUDU-3393  C++ client support split a tablet to mutil ranges 
and concurrent scan data
......................................................................


Patch Set 4:

(9 comments)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/18945/3/src/kudu/client/client-test.cc
File src/kudu/client/client-test.cc:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/18945/3/src/kudu/client/client-test.cc@6922
PS3, Line 6922:     ASSERT_TRUE(it == it_next);
              :     }
              :
              :     {
              :       KuduScanBatch::const_iterator it_end = batch.begin();
              :       std::advance(it_end, kRowNum);
              :       ASSERT_TRUE(batch.end() == it_end);
              :     }
              :
              :     {
              :       KuduScanBatch::const_iterator it(batch.begin());
              :       ASSERT_TRUE(it++ == batch.begin());
              :
              :       KuduScanBatch::const_iterator it_next(batch.begin());
              :       ASSERT_TRUE(++it_next == it);
              :     }
              :
              :     // Check the prefix increment iterator.
              :     {
              :       int count = 0;
              :       for (KuduScanBatch::const_iterator it = batch.begin();
              :            it != batch.end(); ++it) {
              :           ++count;
              :       }
              :       CHECK_EQ(ref_count, count);
              :     }
              :
              :     // Check the postfix increment iterator.
              :     {
              :       int count = 0;
              :       for (KuduScanBatch::const_iterator it = batch.begin();
              :            it != batch.end(); it++) {
              :           ++count;
              :       }
              :       CHECK_EQ(ref_count, count);
              :     }
              :
              :     // Check access to row via indirection operator *
              :     // and member access through pointer operator ->
              :     {
              :       KuduScanBatch::const_iterator it(batch.begin());
              :       ASSERT_TRUE(it != batch.end());
              :       int32_t x = 0, y = 0;
              :       ASSERT_OK((*it).GetInt32(0, &x));
              :       ASSERT_OK(it->GetInt32(0, &y));
              :       ASSERT_EQ(x, y);
              :     }
              :
              :     {
              :       KuduScanBatch::const_iterator it_pre(batch.begin());
              :       KuduScanBatch::const_iterator it_post(batch.begin());
              :       for (; it_pre != batch.end(); ++it_pre, it_post++) {
              :           ASSERT_TRUE(it_pre == it_post);
              :           ASSERT_FALSE(it_pre != it_post);
              :       }
              :     }
              :
              :     // Check that iterators which are going over different 
batches
              :     // are different, even if they iterate over the same raw 
data.
              :     {
              :       KuduScanner other_scanner(client_table_.get());
              :       ASSERT_OK(other_scanner.Open());
              :
              :       KuduScanBatch other_batch;
              :
> To prepare the test table, we only need to create a table with 4 partitions
Do you mean I need to add this case to the integration test? But I think this 
is just a simple function verification, it is not meaningful to add it to the 
integration test just to simplify the creation of tables


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/18945/3/src/kudu/client/client.h
File src/kudu/client/client.h:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/18945/3/src/kudu/client/client.h@3359
PS3, Line 3359:   /// It's corresponding to 'splitSizeBytes' in Java client.
> Is it corresponding to 'splitSizeBytes' in Java client? It would better to
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/18945/3/src/kudu/client/meta_cache.cc
File src/kudu/client/meta_cache.cc:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/18945/3/src/kudu/client/meta_cache.cc@1335
PS3, Line 1335: RETURN_NOT_OK(sync.Wait());
              :
> The variable 's' seems not used any more, how about just  RETURN_NOT_OK(syn
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/18945/3/src/kudu/client/meta_cache.cc@1343
PS3, Line 1343: OK();
> How about use emplace_back?
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/18945/3/src/kudu/client/meta_cache.cc@1346
PS3, Line 1346:
> nit: add a DCHECK_GT(target_chunk_size_bytes, 0) ?
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/18945/3/src/kudu/client/meta_cache.cc@1350
PS3, Line 1350: 
RETURN_NOT_OK(table->client()->data_->GetTabletServer(table->client(),
              :                                                         tablet,
              :                                                         
KuduClient::LEADER_ONLY,
              :                                                         
blacklist,
              :                                                         
&candidates,
              :                                                         &ts));
              :   CHECK(ts);
> How about just  RETURN_NOT_OK(table->client()->data_->GetTabletServer(...))
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/18945/3/src/kudu/client/meta_cache.cc@1357
PS3, Line 1357:   CHECK(ts->proxy());
> CHECK ts is not nullptr at first?
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/18945/3/src/kudu/client/meta_cache.cc@1381
PS3, Line 1381: RETURN_NOT_OK(proxy->SplitKeyRange(req, &resp, &rpc));
              :   if (resp.has_erro
> How about just  RETURN_NOT_OK(proxy->SplitKeyRange(...)); ?
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/18945/3/src/kudu/client/meta_cache.cc@1392
PS3, Line 1392:
> How about use emplace_back?
Done



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/18945
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: kudu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I207f9584cd558d32fcd9e8de7d6c25e517377272
Gerrit-Change-Number: 18945
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: KeDeng <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: KeDeng <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins (120)
Gerrit-Reviewer: Yingchun Lai <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 06:13:18 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to