> On March 2, 2015, 7:35 a.m., Dave Lester wrote:
> > Is the Torque framework still maintained? I believe the documentation page 
> > this previously linked to (which is now broken) was taken offline because 
> > it was no longer supported. If that's the case, we should go ahead and 
> > remove torque from the codebase or document this unmaintained status.
> 
> Palak Choudhary wrote:
>     Hey Dave,
>     
>     Should I just go ahead and remove torque from the list on the page then?

Hi Palak, sorry for the delay. Yes, I think we should remove Torque from the 
list on that webpage.
We recently discussed moving the torque framework out of the Mesos codebase 
too, as Dave suggested, but that can be handled separately from your 
documentation patch.
http://search-hadoop.com/m/RFt15cQS0T1/torque+mesos&subj=Re+Regarding+old+frameworks+in+Mesos+repository


- Adam


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31595/#review74736
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 2, 2015, 7:36 a.m., Palak Choudhary wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/31595/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 2, 2015, 7:36 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Dave Lester.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2311
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2311
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changed mesos-frameworks torque page dead link
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/mesos-frameworks.md 206898264832b6fca79046485de2a8c281eeaaaa 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31595/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Palak Choudhary
> 
>

Reply via email to