-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/33249/#review83136
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/33249/#comment134017>

    No tests for mesos containerizer change?



src/tests/docker_containerizer_tests.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/33249/#comment134016>

    Do you want to call it just _pull to be consistent here? It's not going to 
clash because we usually prefix the namespace.



src/tests/docker_containerizer_tests.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/33249/#comment134015>

    Remove the extra two spaces.


- Timothy Chen


On May 9, 2015, 2:42 a.m., Jay Buffington wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/33249/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 9, 2015, 2:42 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Jie Yu, and Timothy Chen.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2020 and MESOS-2656
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2020
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2656
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Send statusUpdate to scheduler on containerizer launch failure
> 
> This review is actually for three commits.  The three commits are separated 
> out on github here:
> https://github.com/apache/mesos/compare/master...jaybuff:report-launch-failure?expand=1
> 
> Commit #1:
> docker-no-executor-framework example should send ContainerInfo
> 
> docker-no-executor-framework stopped working when the protobuf message
> changed during development.  Apparently noone noticed because we don't
> run it as part of our test suite.  I used it to develop a fix for
> proper error reporting, so I fixed it.
> 
> Commit #2:
> serialize wait and destroy in containerizer
> 
> Containerizers keep track of all the containers they have created.  When
> a container is destroy()'ed the containerizer removes the container from
> its internal hashmap.  This means that wait() must be called before the
> container is destroyed.
> 
> When the docker containerizer fails because of a "docker pull" or
> "docker run" failure, we end up with a race condition where wait() does
> not properly return the Termination, so we ended up with a default
> failure message of "Abnormal Executor Termination" which isn't very
> useful.
> 
> This commit solves this issue by not destroying the container until
> after wait is called in the failure case.
> 
> Fixes MESOS-2656
> 
> Commit #3:
> send scheduler containerizer launch failure errors
> 
> If a method in the launch sequence returns a failure the error message
> wasn't making it back to the scheduler.
> 
> Fixes MESOS-2020
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/containerizer/containerizer.proto 
> 95c84dfbecef28ca9a220a98293c5fc6215a692f 
>   src/examples/docker_no_executor_framework.cpp 
> d5385d9295d30a6039bab9938f3270006582d3da 
>   src/slave/containerizer/containerizer.hpp 
> 56c088abb036aa26c323c3142fd27ea29ed51d4f 
>   src/slave/containerizer/docker.hpp b25ec55bf3cd30d6e8a804d09d90c632a7d12e3f 
>   src/slave/containerizer/docker.cpp f9fc89ad7e3c853c3f9f6dcf9aa68e54dc1888c6 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.hpp 
> 5e5f13ed8a71ff9510b40b6032d00fd16d312622 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp 
> f2587280dc0e1d566d2b856a80358c7b3896c603 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp c78ee3c9e7fc38ad364e83f4abe267e86bfbbc13 
>   src/tests/docker_containerizer_tests.cpp 
> c9d66b3fbc7d081f36c26781573dca50de823c44 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33249/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> I used examples/docker_no_executor_framework.cpp, and wrote a few tests and 
> ran make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jay Buffington
> 
>

Reply via email to