-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35562/#review88272
-----------------------------------------------------------


Would it make sense to have this RR as being the last in this chain? That way 
we could be safely commit earlier RRs without breaking the build.


src/slave/containerizer/mesos/launch.cpp (line 23)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/35562/#comment140702>

    Seems we can kill this one.



src/slave/containerizer/mesos/launch.cpp (line 36)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/35562/#comment140703>

    .. and this one :)



src/slave/containerizer/mesos/launch.cpp (line 218)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/35562/#comment140701>

    Does this TODO refer to a "clean environment" as being an environment 
without anything being set [envp={NULL}]? In any case, does it still make sense 
to have this TODO?


- Till Toenshoff


On June 17, 2015, 2:28 p.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/35562/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 17, 2015, 2:28 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Till Toenshoff.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2832
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2832
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/launch.cpp 
> 2f2d60e2011f60ec711d3b29fd2c157e30c83c34 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35562/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Hindman
> 
>

Reply via email to