----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35838/#review89291 -----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it! src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.hpp (lines 289 - 290) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/35838/#comment141882> Hm.. might be helpful for those coming across this if we describe why we want to consider separating it. i.e. frameworks might want more revocable resources only or non-revocable resources only, but currently the filter only expires if there is more of both revocable and non-revocable resources. - Ben Mahler On June 24, 2015, 6:17 p.m., Jie Yu wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/35838/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated June 24, 2015, 6:17 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler and Vinod Kone. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Added a TODO about RefusedFilter in hierarchical allocator. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.hpp > ef18ff850addfb5ce3500ed28e8ffd801e2d24eb > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35838/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > > Thanks, > > Jie Yu > >
