> On June 29, 2015, 5:57 p.m., Adam B wrote:
> > docs/mesos-ssl.md, lines 58-59
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/36003/diff/3/?file=995165#file995165line58>
> >
> >     Can you list RHEL/Ubuntu instructions as well? (For OpenSSL as well)
> 
> Joris Van Remoortere wrote:
>     I'm reluctant to add the instructions as I can't easily verify the 
> version of these packages on those systems.
>     I wasn't worried about it as much on OSX because those won't be used to 
> run production servers, and it makes it easier for people to try it out.
>     I'd rather remove the instructions for OSX and suggest building 
> libevent-2.0.22-stable and the newest stable release of openssl from source.
>     What do you think?

Fair enough. Instead of removing the OSX example, how about just rewording "For 
OSX" into "For example, on OSX" so it sounds more like you're giving one 
install example than that you're listing detailed install instructions. For 
other distros, you provided links, and it's left as an exercise for the 
sysadmin.


- Adam


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36003/#review89833
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 29, 2015, 10:47 p.m., Joris Van Remoortere wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/36003/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 29, 2015, 10:47 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B and Benjamin Hindman.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2942
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2942
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> [Here](https://gist.github.com/jmlvanre/82f30d9ea1ea4d815736) is a Github 
> rendered version
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/mesos-ssl.md PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36003/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joris Van Remoortere
> 
>

Reply via email to