> On July 2, 2015, 5:04 p.m., Marco Massenzio wrote: > > CHANGELOG, line 11 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/36152/diff/2/?file=998642#file998642line11> > > > > how about `beta` instead of `experimental`? > > or should we functionally distinguish between `alpha` (which is what > > "experimental" sounds to me) v. `beta` features? > > > > I personally would prefer the use of "alpha" / "beta" as more standard > > in industry parlance than "experimental" (which makes it sound more like a > > science project :) )
Back in 0.14.0, we called "Resource Reservations" and the Jenkins plugin "experimental", and then in 0.19.0 we referred to the external containerizer as "alpha", so we're already mixing terminology. I went with "experimental" because that's what we've used in conversation, and that's what the revocable resources line already said. If we're going to distinguish between alpha vs. beta, it'd be good to have a clear distinction. I usually think of alpha as "for internal testing" and beta "for public testing", but that doesn't apply to open-source. - Adam ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36152/#review90298 ----------------------------------------------------------- On July 2, 2015, 4:47 p.m., Adam B wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/36152/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 2, 2015, 4:47 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Bernd Mathiske, Ben Mahler, Jie > Yu, Joris Van Remoortere, Marco Massenzio, Michael Park, Timothy Chen, and > Vinod Kone. > > > Repository: mesos-incubating > > > Description > ------- > > Copied in contents of JIRA Release Notes, categorized. > > > Diffs > ----- > > CHANGELOG 252f068 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36152/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Adam B > >
