> On July 8, 2015, 3:18 a.m., Adam B wrote:
> > docs/network-monitoring.md, line 17
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/36281/diff/3/?file=1001910#file1001910line17>
> >
> >     > "Mesos will automatically check for those kernel functionalities and 
> > will abort if they are not supported"
> >     Is this still true?

Yes


- Paul


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36281/#review90857
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 8, 2015, 12:59 a.m., Paul Brett wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/36281/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 8, 2015, 12:59 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Ian Downes, Jie Yu, and Cong Wang.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Document per-container unique egress flows and network queueing statistics.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/home.md bc277910907c381c08835b6e9d485b27d6da5002 
>   docs/network-monitoring.md 8889fb165cc70bc382be0c99de8d7748328abf57 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36281/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Rendered at https://www.notehub.org/2015/7/7/network-isolation for review.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Paul Brett
> 
>

Reply via email to