-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36829/#review93077
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!



3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/unimplemented.hpp (line 29)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/36829/#comment147336>

    const?



3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/unimplemented.hpp (line 30)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/36829/#comment147337>

    Perhaps I am missing something, but is it reasonable to assume that 
<iostream> will always be included before this header?



3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/unimplemented.hpp (line 32)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/36829/#comment147338>

    Ditto about <stdlib.h>.


- Artem Harutyunyan


On July 26, 2015, 2 p.m., Joris Van Remoortere wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/36829/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 26, 2015, 2 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Artem Harutyunyan, Joseph Wu, and 
> Michael Park.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3122
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3122
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/Makefile.am 
> 5c19e3ef8ba50ab007eda26b752441f076ca7ed0 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/unimplemented.hpp 
> PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36829/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> requires follow-up patch.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joris Van Remoortere
> 
>

Reply via email to