-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/38380/#review98962
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/slave/containerizer/isolators/cgroups/perf_event.cpp (line 374)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/38380/#comment155718>

    I don't think cgroup can be destroyed while perf running, kernel should 
return EBUSY, no?



src/slave/containerizer/isolators/cgroups/perf_event.cpp (line 423)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/38380/#comment155719>

    Just nit: the original comment is useful for understanding the code, event 
after this change.


- Cong Wang


On Sept. 14, 2015, 10:57 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/38380/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 14, 2015, 10:57 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This removes the special casing of the empty set of cgroups case to simplify 
> the sample loop, along with some other minor cleanups.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/isolators/cgroups/perf_event.cpp 
> 7dc8b7a99074b74ade019ef4df296780650a2e4e 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38380/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ben Mahler
> 
>

Reply via email to