> On Sept. 15, 2015, 10:10 p.m., Anand Mazumdar wrote:
> > include/mesos/executor/executor.proto, line 163
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/38278/diff/3/?file=1074517#file1074517line163>
> >
> >     Minor: Can we also have a comment before the `framework_id` field ?
> >     
> >     // Identifies the framework which generated this call.

My bad, ignore. I did not see already that the `tuple` (`ExecutorID`, 
`FrameworkID`) in itself idenfies the executor.


- Anand


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/38278/#review99109
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 15, 2015, 9:32 p.m., Isabel Jimenez wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/38278/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 15, 2015, 9:32 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B, Anand Mazumdar, and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Adding last changes of the executor HTTP API design to the unversioned 
> protobuf
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/executor/executor.proto 52c84b3 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38278/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Isabel Jimenez
> 
>

Reply via email to