-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/38251/#review99632
-----------------------------------------------------------


Thanks for fixing this @gyliu ! Just a minor comment about a alternate simple 
approach that would allow us to not duplicate the same log messages twice. I 
commented only on the HTTP workflow but the same comment also applies to the 
PID based workflow.


src/master/master.cpp (line 1959)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/38251/#comment156569>

    I wonder if we can simply do this instead of duplicating the log messages 
twice. What do you think ? ( Don't copy my suggested comments in the 
code-snippet though :-) )
    
    ```
    if (framework->connected && !subscribe.force()) {
     FrameworkErrorMessage message;
     ... blah blah
     http.close();
     return;
    }
    
    // It's now safe to update the framework fields since the request is now 
gurranteed to be successful.
    
    LOG(INFO) << "Updating info for framework " << framework->id();
    
    framework->updateFrameworkInfo(frameworkInfo);
    allocator->updateFramework(framework->id(),  framework->info);
    
    framework->reregisteredTime = Clock::now();
    
    if (subscribe.force()) {
      // already existing logic blah blah.
    } else {
      // already existing logic blah blah.
    }
    ```


- Anand Mazumdar


On Sept. 14, 2015, 2:19 a.m., Guangya Liu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/38251/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 14, 2015, 2:19 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Joris Van Remoortere and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3169
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3169
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> FrameworkInfo should only be updated if the re-registration is valid
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/master.cpp 4b60e637b19e749e27c4a8eb9b0a95c7e9305c5f 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38251/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Guangya Liu
> 
>

Reply via email to