> On Sept. 18, 2015, 10:22 p.m., Timothy Chen wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/provisioner/backends/copy.hpp, line 38
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/38511/diff/1/?file=1077069#file1077069line38>
> >
> >     most of the comments makes sense.
> >     however what do you mean by writing to root is not accounted for? what 
> > kind of accounting are you referring to?

The disk space it takes. Our current DiskIsolator doesn't count disk space 
outside the sandbox and it's not straightforward to just count the provisioned 
rootfs either because the user/task doesn't ask for it to be copied, the 
slave/operator decided it. Make sense?

I will update point 2) to make it more clear.


- Jiang Yan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/38511/#review99653
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 18, 2015, 3:13 p.m., Jiang Yan Xu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/38511/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 18, 2015, 3:13 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Jie Yu, Jojy Varghese, and Timothy Chen.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> - We should investigate how to resolve these implications or 
> disable/discourage the use of this backend in production after the overlay 
> backend is committed.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/provisioner/backends/copy.hpp 
> 10d9aee8c69e29e0cc9848fc5bde9919d0732b09 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38511/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> N/A.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jiang Yan Xu
> 
>

Reply via email to