-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/38514/#review99710
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/master/http.cpp (line 486)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/38514/#comment156694>

    this method should be called suppress too.
    
    to avoid conflict with the suppress marco, can you try putting that macro 
inside a "signals" namespace?


- Vinod Kone


On Sept. 19, 2015, 1:27 a.m., Guangya Liu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/38514/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 19, 2015, 1:27 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3037
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3037
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> A comment from Vinod: After some discussion with other committers,
> most of them felt SUPPRESS is better than QUIESCE.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/scheduler/scheduler.proto 
> 89ddc10d5873cdf09bf5084c4869bc7c29933eab 
>   include/mesos/v1/scheduler/scheduler.proto 
> bc19b8dfb2ded26a30a28e7370f06816e0fb1999 
>   src/master/http.cpp 7cca8b1d3118fe99de79cfaf5360825012d830da 
>   src/master/master.cpp 64e5fb9e27b2e6797b2ce87c0e1a3ef8a2943e27 
>   src/master/validation.cpp 0f3fc1a20b065a88712cceabab0ceffaec598533 
>   src/sched/sched.cpp 84c2edb2c660f976fd57d1407dd2e9d5376500aa 
>   src/tests/scheduler_tests.cpp 0f892f9d423f0bc72cdab22452e0ad7965dda444 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38514/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Platform: Ubuntu:14.04
> make
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Guangya Liu
> 
>

Reply via email to