> On Oct. 6, 2015, 9:47 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> > src/common/resources.cpp, line 880
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/39056/diff/2/?file=1092068#file1092068line880>
> >
> >     Can you introduce a `CHECK_DOUBLE_EQ` in `stout/check.hpp`, similar to
> >     
> > https://code.google.com/p/googletest/wiki/AdvancedGuide#Floating-Point_Macros
> >     
> >     To choose a default epsilon, you probably want to check the above link. 
> > Gtest uses "Units in the Last Place (ULPs)" as the default.

CHECK_DOUBLE_EQ will also fail. 

F0930 18:15:38.169140 26984 resources.cpp:874] Check failed: 
(result.cpus().get()) >= (cpus().get())-0.000000000000001L (24 vs. 24) *** 
Check failure stack trace: *** F0930 18:15:38.169322 26991 resources.cpp:874] 
Check failed: (result.cpus().get()) >= (cpus().get())-0.000000000000001L (24 
vs. 24) *** Check failure stack trace: ***

CHECK_NEAR() is the right Macro to use. 


But we also need to check (isNone() and isNone()) equality and hence the 
present implementation. I think the long term fix is to wrap double into Double 
and have the opeartor== to the right thing.


> On Oct. 6, 2015, 9:47 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> > src/v1/resources.cpp, lines 880-886
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/39056/diff/2/?file=1092070#file1092070line880>
> >
> >     Not yours, but too bad we need to duplicate the logic here. I am now 
> > sure what will be the long term plan here. If we have 10 versions, do we 
> > need to copy the code 10 times... That's not good :(

I agree !! I already missed src/v1/resources.cpp in my first review request :) 
Thanks Neil.


- Mandeep


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/39056/#review101691
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 6, 2015, 9:33 p.m., Mandeep Chadha wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/39056/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 6, 2015, 9:33 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Neil Conway.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3552
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3552
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Check failed due to double comparison : MESOS-3552.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/common/resources.cpp 601388c35a1bff37c58e753d1870d53b8d0af2d1 
>   src/tests/reservation_tests.cpp 6b7c43c8b5c64618249dbee926383242320c111e 
>   src/v1/resources.cpp dc868903472f8f3a1ddc56092e3f8f81d953ce39 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39056/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Added unit test.
> make check successful.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Mandeep Chadha
> 
>

Reply via email to