> On Oct. 13, 2015, 11:01 a.m., Mesos ReviewBot wrote:
> > Bad patch!
> > 
> > Reviews applied: [39076, 39091, 39092, 39093, 39096, 39097, 39180, 39181, 
> > 39201, 39182, 39202, 39203, 39204, 39207, 39208, 39209, 39210, 39213, 
> > 39217, 39218, 39219, 39220]
> > 
> > Failed command: ./support/apply-review.sh -n -r 39220
> > 
> > Error:
> >  2015-10-13 11:01:08 URL:https://reviews.apache.org/r/39220/diff/raw/ 
> > [4689/4689] -> "39220.patch" [1]
> > error: patch failed: CMakeLists.txt:89
> > error: CMakeLists.txt: patch does not apply
> > error: patch failed: src/CMakeLists.txt:223
> > error: src/CMakeLists.txt: patch does not apply
> > Failed to apply patch

39220 is a review that used to apply and no longer does. Looks like it's time 
to update the whole chain!


- Alex


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/39265/#review102430
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 13, 2015, 9:10 a.m., Alex Clemmer wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/39265/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 13, 2015, 9:10 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Artem Harutyunyan, Joris Van Remoortere, and Joseph 
> Wu.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Windows: Move `os::environment` to its own file.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/Makefile.am 
> 9e9c3119ad18f4cbc70c70095c71dc4fd19553df 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os.hpp 
> 5141c1369af60afd6cd5c70c6295d575ea960a83 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/environment.hpp 
> PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39265/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `make check` on Ubuntu 15, OS X 10.10, and running the `check` project on 
> Windows 10.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alex Clemmer
> 
>

Reply via email to