> On Oct. 13, 2015, 3:35 a.m., Guangya Liu wrote: > > include/mesos/resources.hpp, lines 114-118 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/39018/diff/10/?file=1096259#file1096259line114> > > > > Can this be removed or merged to the under comments? > > Greg Mann wrote: > I put the comment here so that it wouldn't interfere with the Doxygen > documentation, which should be placed directly before the member declaration. > I don't want to remove it, because I think the TODO is still valid. I'm open > to moving it if there is a better place for it; do you have one in mind? > > Guangya Liu wrote: > What about moving those comments to /**/ section? > > Greg Mann wrote: > But then it will show up in the documentation, correct? My motivation for > leaving it out of the /**/ section was to exclude this comment from the docs. > > Guangya Liu wrote: > I think it is ok to show up some TODO in document, thoughts? Thanks.
Yea now that I think of it, the increased visibility of the TODO might even be a good thing :-) Moved. - Greg ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39018/#review102382 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Oct. 14, 2015, 3:50 p.m., Greg Mann wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/39018/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Oct. 14, 2015, 3:50 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Adam B, Alexander Rukletsov, Jie Yu, and Michael > Park. > > > Bugs: MESOS-2467 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2467 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > This includes code changes necessary for JSON parsing of Resources. > Documentation changes will be posted soon in another review > (https://reviews.apache.org/r/39102/). > > > Diffs > ----- > > include/mesos/resources.hpp 6c3a065945eb56dc88df9c977e5ca11d4cbcbf61 > include/mesos/v1/resources.hpp fe8925ac851b74d1b37919f00afc7ed816f47ea5 > src/common/resources.cpp 601388c35a1bff37c58e753d1870d53b8d0af2d1 > src/tests/resources_tests.cpp 6584fc6c39e6ffe9f8085576677dcc669f127697 > src/v1/resources.cpp dc868903472f8f3a1ddc56092e3f8f81d953ce39 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39018/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > New code was added to `ResourcesTest.ParsingFromJSON`, and two new tests were > added: `ResourcesTest.ParsingFromJSONWithRoles` and > `ResourcesTest.ParsingFromJSONError`. These attempt to test common error > scenarios that might show up in user-supplied JSON. > > `make check` was used to confirm that all tests pass, with one notable > failure (ResourcesTest.ParsingFromJSONError) related to a picojson issue > tracked here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3698 > > The original resources parsing format is used throughout many other tests > (check `src/tests/sorter_tests.cpp`, for example), so it's clear that the > original parsing continues to work correctly. > > > Thanks, > > Greg Mann > >