-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/39372/#review102874
-----------------------------------------------------------


Patch looks great!

Reviews applied: [39372]

All tests passed.

- Mesos ReviewBot


On Oct. 16, 2015, 2:49 a.m., Anand Mazumdar wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/39372/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 16, 2015, 2:49 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler, Isabel Jimenez, and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3339
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3339
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Instead of introducing a `DROP_HTTP_EVENT` filtering abstraction, made the 
> existing interface callback based that allows to use the already existing 
> testing semantics. Also, the new interface allows us to use a generic 
> interface across scheduler library versions.
> 
> This gets rid of the following hack:
> ```
> // Enqueues all received events into a libprocess queue.
> ACTION_P(Enqueue, queue)
> {
>   std::queue<Event> events = arg0;
>   while (!events.empty()) {
>     // Note that we currently drop HEARTBEATs because most of these tests
>     // are not designed to deal with heartbeats.
>     // TODO(vinod): Implement DROP_HTTP_CALLS that can filter heartbeats.
>     if (events.front().type() == Event::HEARTBEAT) {
>       VLOG(1) << "Ignoring HEARTBEAT event";
>     } else {
>       queue->put(events.front());
>     }
>     events.pop();
>   }
> }
> ```
> 
> New way ( similar to what we do for the driver implementation )
> ```
> EXPECT_CALL(callbacks, heartbeat())
>     .WillRepeatedly(Return()); // Ignore heartbeats.
> ```
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/mesos.hpp 3e58b454c75a2ab9f8b4a29785fa823afefd0c8a 
>   src/tests/scheduler_tests.cpp 7946cb48d62f4ed6d0fdbc771746518e31921f97 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39372/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check ( I only modified a couple of existing tests to show the new 
> interface usage. If the interface looks good, would go ahead and modify all 
> the tests )
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Anand Mazumdar
> 
>

Reply via email to