> On Oct. 19, 2015, 10:58 p.m., Anand Mazumdar wrote: > > 3rdparty/libprocess/README.md, line 378 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/39459/diff/1/?file=1101284#file1101284line378> > > > > Nit, How about: > > > > ```A process that initiates > > an asynchronous operation would like to know if the operation hasn't > > completed > > within a certain time bound. To facilitate this, libprocess provides a > > set of > > abstractions that simplify writing timeout logic.```
I was trying to support the idea that you can use timeouts for lots of things, although pursuing an alternative after an operation hasn't completed is a common case. Happy to change if you think your text is clearer though. - Neil ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39459/#review103179 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Oct. 19, 2015, 11:06 p.m., Neil Conway wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/39459/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Oct. 19, 2015, 11:06 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Anand Mazumdar, Benjamin Hindman, and Greg Mann. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Lots more to add, but this is a start. > > > Diffs > ----- > > 3rdparty/libprocess/README.md 769b79f9a9f816e618dfde62b653e3194386908d > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39459/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Previewed via Github Gist. > > > Thanks, > > Neil Conway > >
