> On Oct. 19, 2015, 10:58 p.m., Anand Mazumdar wrote:
> > 3rdparty/libprocess/README.md, line 378
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/39459/diff/1/?file=1101284#file1101284line378>
> >
> >     Nit, How about:
> >     
> >     ```A process that initiates
> >     an asynchronous operation would like to know if the operation hasn't 
> > completed
> >     within a certain time bound. To facilitate this, libprocess provides a 
> > set of
> >     abstractions that simplify writing timeout logic.```

I was trying to support the idea that you can use timeouts for lots of things, 
although pursuing an alternative after an operation hasn't completed is a 
common case. Happy to change if you think your text is clearer though.


- Neil


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/39459/#review103179
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 19, 2015, 11:06 p.m., Neil Conway wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/39459/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 19, 2015, 11:06 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Anand Mazumdar, Benjamin Hindman, and Greg Mann.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Lots more to add, but this is a start.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/README.md 769b79f9a9f816e618dfde62b653e3194386908d 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39459/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Previewed via Github Gist.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Neil Conway
> 
>

Reply via email to