-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/39518/#review103739
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/slave/containerizer/provisioner/docker/registry_client.cpp (line 615)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39518/#comment161819>

    I find it surprising that this would need to be handled here since I would 
have expected a proper `write` to deal with that correctly.
    
    Are you trying to work-around a bug elsewhere?



src/slave/containerizer/provisioner/docker/registry_client.cpp (line 633)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39518/#comment161817>

    This seems to be happen in `write(int fd, void* data, size_t size)` already 
anyway.



src/slave/containerizer/provisioner/docker/registry_client.cpp (line 641)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39518/#comment161818>

    Wouldn't this potentially cause data loss if the called `write` function 
cannot dump everything in the `fd`?


- Benjamin Bannier


On Oct. 21, 2015, 6:13 p.m., Jojy Varghese wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/39518/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 21, 2015, 6:13 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Timothy Chen.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3773
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3773
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See MESOS-3773.
> 
> Change:
> io::write(fd, string) has been having issues with junk being written to the
> file. Using io::write(fd, void*, size_t) does not have this issue.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/provisioner/docker/registry_client.cpp 
> 24aa95c5800ff4dfb37465b71421b014b5dd5998 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39518/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Make check.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jojy Varghese
> 
>

Reply via email to