-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/39986/#review105378
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/tests/authorization_tests.cpp (lines 426 - 429)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39986/#comment163952>

    Need a request test for this acl.



src/tests/authorization_tests.cpp (lines 491 - 494)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39986/#comment163954>

    A request acl test for this?



src/tests/authorization_tests.cpp (line 510)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39986/#comment163953>

    Can we limit this to 70 chars?


- Guangya Liu


On 十一月 5, 2015, 9:52 p.m., Greg Mann wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/39986/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 十一月 5, 2015, 9:52 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B, Jie Yu, Michael Park, and Till Toenshoff.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3062
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3062
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Enabled the Authorizer to handle Reserve/Unreserve ACLs.
> Note: this review is continued from https://reviews.apache.org/r/37110/
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/authorizer/authorizer.hpp 
> d667a52f90f970a313580446a5a006cec4b5e25b 
>   src/authorizer/local/authorizer.hpp 
> 32de102fd588f029882ef2222121ca83a7410c65 
>   src/authorizer/local/authorizer.cpp 
> 6d7da87731a438c2180cf91003e09d4aa5a1c773 
>   src/tests/authorization_tests.cpp 4940450193d89a8f11a15d31723119fa26cdab1b 
>   src/tests/mesos.hpp f731ac3284a5793b6bf510d3a5b742cbe0938217 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39986/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> The is the second in a chain of 5 patches. This diff includes new tests for 
> the authorization of reserve and unreserve operations via ACLs. `make check` 
> was used to test after all patches were applied.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Greg Mann
> 
>

Reply via email to