----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39949/#review105561 -----------------------------------------------------------
Bad patch! Reviews applied: [39948] Failed command: ./support/apply-review.sh -n -r 39948 Error: 2015-11-07 01:50:12 URL:https://reviews.apache.org/r/39948/diff/raw/ [2087/2087] -> "39948.patch" [1] error: patch failed: 3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp:739 error: 3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp: patch does not apply Failed to apply patch - Mesos ReviewBot On Nov. 6, 2015, 10:11 p.m., Joseph Wu wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/39949/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Nov. 6, 2015, 10:11 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Joris Van Remoortere, and Neil > Conway. > > > Bugs: MESOS-3820 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3820 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > * Renamed `initialized` to `initialize_started`. > * Renamed `initializing` to `initialize_complete`. > * Removed the (2) condition, described below: > > The initialization synchronization logic contains three conditions, which > check: > 1) Was `initialize` called and is it done? > 2) Was `initialize` called and is it not done? > 3) Are you the first to call `initialize`? > > Condition (3) uses `compare_exchange_strong` between `initialized` and > `false`. This returns `true` (and sets `initialized` to true) iff the caller > is the first to reach that expression. > > The second simultaneous caller of `initialize` will either satisify condition > (2) or (3) and then wait on `initializing`. For the second caller, (2) and > (3) are identical because `compare_exchange_strong` between `true` and > `false` will always return false, thereby putting the second caller into the > waiting loop. > > > Diffs > ----- > > 3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp > a94712b9ac3b60fb047b3a5a4d84a56fa4d02313 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39949/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > `make check` > > Replaced `process::initialize();` in `3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/main.cpp` > with: > ``` > > const size_t numThreads = 50; > > std::thread* runningThreads[numThreads]; > > // Create additional threads. > for (size_t i = 0; i < numThreads; i++) { > runningThreads[i] = new std::thread([]() { > process::initialize(); > }); > } > > for (size_t i = 0; i < numThreads; i++) { > runningThreads[i]->join(); > delete runningThreads[i]; > } > ``` > (Also added `#include <thread>` to the header). > > Rebuilt `libprocess-tests` with the modification and ran it a few times. > `3rdparty/libprocess/libprocess-tests` > > > Thanks, > > Joseph Wu > >
