-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/39276/#review105821
-----------------------------------------------------------



3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/event.hpp (line 145)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39276/#comment164490>

    rename to `response`



3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp (line 189)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39276/#comment164491>

    All code related to this go to another patch.



3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp (lines 2334 - 2336)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39276/#comment164494>

    if we do move, remove this comment.



3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp (line 2337)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39276/#comment164489>

    No pointer +  std::move.



3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp (lines 2341 - 2343)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39276/#comment164496>

    Reuse similar comments for this code there.



3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/http_tests.cpp (line 1178)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39276/#comment164492>

    to separate patch, change other test and verify this one is actually needed.
    
    Also write down that we need to reorder the ProcessBase::visit



3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/http_tests.cpp (line 1183)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39276/#comment164507>

    Remove.



3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/http_tests.cpp (line 1218)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39276/#comment164509>

    Try to reuse requests.


- Alexander Rojas


On Nov. 10, 2015, 4:58 a.m., Alexander Rojas wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/39276/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 10, 2015, 4:58 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Anand Mazumdar, Bernd Mathiske, and Till Toenshoff.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3705
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3705
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> When using the same socket to send multiple HTTP requests to different 
> actors. If the actor responsible for handling the first request is stuck 
> handling another event while a subsequent request can reply immediatly, the 
> order of the responses is altered violating HTTP Pipelining.
> 
> This patch fixes that problem enforcing that every response is sent in the 
> order the corresponding request arrived. It also adds a test to reproduce the 
> issue and verify the fix works.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/event.hpp 
> 16ddbd77afa6efdf6bad201aa497ee102aa863ae 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp 
> a94712b9ac3b60fb047b3a5a4d84a56fa4d02313 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/http_tests.cpp 
> 7eb4ef187b2cb358c370d0381db65b8e18668bab 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39276/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rojas
> 
>

Reply via email to