> On Nov. 10, 2015, 8:23 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > support/apply-review.sh, line 5
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/40129/diff/1/?file=1121350#file1121350line5>
> >
> >     do we even need this script anymore? is this for backwards compatiblity 
> > with existing tooling? is that plan to kill this eventually? worth adding 
> > some comments/TODO/JIRA for this.
> 
> Artem Harutyunyan wrote:
>     Here is the JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3885.
>     
>     `verify_reviews.py` still references apply-review.sh. We should probably 
> give a notice on dev@ list before removing the script. What do you think?

lets update verify_reviews.py to call apply_reviews.py? notice sounds good.


- Vinod


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/40129/#review105943
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 10, 2015, 8:02 a.m., Artem Harutyunyan wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/40129/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 10, 2015, 8:02 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Joris Van Remoortere and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3868
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3868
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Updated apply-review.sh to use apply-reviews.py.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   support/apply-review.sh 6391451542e9e8847ec38e2ad9d9acf552afead3 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40129/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Artem Harutyunyan
> 
>

Reply via email to