-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/39987/#review106518
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/master/master.cpp (lines 2737 - 2738)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39987/#comment165223>

    This temp variable does not seem to be necessary. Can you just do:
    
    ```
    LOG(INFO) << "Authorizing principal '"
              << (principal.isSome() ? principal.get() : "ANY")
              << "' to reserve resources";
    ```



src/master/master.cpp (line 2754)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39987/#comment165224>

    We don't use tailing period for log messages. Please do a sweep to fix all 
of them.



src/master/master.cpp (lines 2782 - 2789)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39987/#comment165221>

    I think we should assume validation::operation::validate(unreserve) has 
already been called. Maybe use a CHECK here is more appropriate.
    
    ```
    CHECK(isDynamicallyReserved(resource))
      << ...
    ```



src/master/master.cpp (lines 2794 - 2799)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39987/#comment165222>

    Can you just stringify(unreserve.resources()) below when calling LOG(INFO)?



src/master/master.cpp (lines 2802 - 2804)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39987/#comment165225>

    Ditto above. No need for the 'principalString' temp variable.


- Jie Yu


On Nov. 13, 2015, 4:30 a.m., Greg Mann wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/39987/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 13, 2015, 4:30 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B, Jie Yu, Michael Park, and Till Toenshoff.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3062
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3062
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added 'Master::authorize(Un)reserveResources()' for Reserve/Unreserve.
> Note: this review is continued from https://reviews.apache.org/r/37125/
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/master.hpp ead8520b7108a0f2c3a0bb11ae7b543897d111a2 
>   src/master/master.cpp 7bac0fea4bcd040307fdfdcd002387d5baee46d1 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39987/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> This is the third in a chain of 5 patches. `make check` was used to test 
> after all patches were applied.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Greg Mann
> 
>

Reply via email to