> On Nov. 13, 2015, 9:59 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> > include/mesos/authorizer/authorizer.proto, line 75
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/39985/diff/3/?file=1120023#file1120023line75>
> >
> >     Can we call it ReserveResources to match other ACLs? (also, in case we 
> > have other things that we want to reserve in the future).

Thanks Jie, good call! I'm currently updating the other patches in the chain to 
accomodate this change.


- Greg


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/39985/#review106509
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 13, 2015, 11:11 p.m., Greg Mann wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/39985/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 13, 2015, 11:11 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B, Jie Yu, Michael Park, and Till Toenshoff.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3062
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3062
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Introduced ACL protobuf definitions for dynamic reservation.
> Note: this review is continued from https://reviews.apache.org/r/37002/
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/authorizer/authorizer.proto 
> 86bbb45f9d91b4098a262e3e50a793f3bb39497e 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39985/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> This is the first in a chain of 5 patches. `make check` was used to test at 
> the end of the chain.
> 
> Note: documentation for these changes is included in 
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/40271/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Greg Mann
> 
>

Reply via email to