-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/40146/#review106936
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Looks good.  Just a few nits (newlines) here and there to stay consistent with 
the style guide.


3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/windows.hpp 
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/40146/#comment165739>

    We want to keep the double-space here.



3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/windows.hpp (line 278)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/40146/#comment165741>

    We want a double-space here.



3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/windows.hpp 
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/40146/#comment165740>

    We want to keep the double-space here.


- Joseph Wu


On Nov. 10, 2015, 12:14 p.m., Steve Butler wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/40146/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 10, 2015, 12:14 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Alex Clemmer.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3881
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3881
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Windows: Unifies POSIX and Windows PSTree implementations
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/Makefile.am 
> 741639a942971e48e2dac42db238d423e61cac21 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/posix/pstree.hpp 
> fd0192ca021eb0211b293eb2f4e521d588aff04f 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/pstree.hpp 
> 9baa2fbfafa310517b70d54f190167f1cccbad6a 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/windows/pstree.hpp 
> f75a77fc58db09fadf80409f506852e48a7df7c4 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/windows.hpp 
> 1a7037d64afeedc340258c92067e95d1d3caa027 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40146/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Steve Butler
> 
>

Reply via email to