-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/39988/#review108653
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/master/http.cpp (lines 1034 - 1037)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39988/#comment168108>

    Let's leave a comment here, that `principal` matches 
`reservation().principal()` for each resource in 
`operation.reserve().resources()`, hence it's OK to authorize for `principal` 
and use `reservation().principal()` in `unreserve()`. Maybe a symmetrical 
comment in `unreserve()` path would also make sense.
    
    Maybe if you validate before authorizing it will be more easy to understand?


- Alexander Rukletsov


On Dec. 2, 2015, 9:06 a.m., Greg Mann wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/39988/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 2, 2015, 9:06 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B, Jie Yu, Michael Park, and Till Toenshoff.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3062
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3062
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added authorization for dynamic reservation master endpoints.
> Note: this review is continued from https://reviews.apache.org/r/37126/
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/http.cpp 9d729ef7f7d7ad6185934648f833e4f8a4f0a123 
>   src/master/master.hpp 96951e766de32842197506504e5ac67a2caa3efe 
>   src/tests/reservation_endpoints_tests.cpp 
> f30ff8bc6a3e9773437fa7fd7c8f569b7d7e2d9d 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39988/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> This is the fourth in a chain of 5 patches. Added new reservation endpoints 
> tests to validate authorization of reserve and unreserve operations using 
> ACLs. `make check` was run to test after all patches were applied.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Greg Mann
> 
>

Reply via email to