----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/41372/#review110853 -----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it! docs/getting-started.md (line 146) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/41372/#comment170869> We generally seem to use ticks for (versioned) product/project names within code-blocks of this document. ``` 'devtoolset-2' 'subversion > 1.8' 'Mesos > 0.21.0' ``` But also backticks sometimes; ``` `nss` ``` Overall, I think it really does not make much sense to use backticks in these spots. For now, I think ticks are more consistent, so let's do: ``` [..] in 'systemd version 218', which [..] ``` - Till Toenshoff On Dec. 16, 2015, 11:07 p.m., Kevin Klues wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/41372/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Dec. 16, 2015, 11:07 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Gilbert Song, Jojy Varghese, > Joris Van Remoortere, and Neil Conway. > > > Bugs: MESOS-3954 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3954 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Several bugs related to older versions of systemd have caused failures > on centos 7.1 (e.g. MESOS-3296, MESOS-3352, MESOS-3352). We now add > instructions to explicity update systemd as part of the system > requirements. > > > Diffs > ----- > > docs/getting-started.md 0225c9db985261b9c3057b2b376f29b1c80784fb > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/41372/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Kevin Klues > >
