-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41372/#review110853
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!



docs/getting-started.md (line 146)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/41372/#comment170869>

    We generally seem to use ticks for (versioned) product/project names within 
code-blocks of this document.
    ```
    'devtoolset-2'
    'subversion > 1.8'
    'Mesos > 0.21.0'
    ```
    
    But also backticks sometimes;
    ```
    `nss`
    ```
    
    Overall, I think it really does not make much sense to use backticks in 
these spots.
    
    For now, I think ticks are more consistent, so let's do:
    ```
    [..] in 'systemd version 218', which [..]
    ```


- Till Toenshoff


On Dec. 16, 2015, 11:07 p.m., Kevin Klues wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/41372/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 16, 2015, 11:07 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Gilbert Song, Jojy Varghese, 
> Joris Van Remoortere, and Neil Conway.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3954
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3954
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Several bugs related to older versions of systemd have caused failures
> on centos 7.1 (e.g. MESOS-3296, MESOS-3352, MESOS-3352). We now add
> instructions to explicity update systemd as part of the system
> requirements.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/getting-started.md 0225c9db985261b9c3057b2b376f29b1c80784fb 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/41372/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kevin Klues
> 
>

Reply via email to