> On Jan. 9, 2016, 4:09 a.m., Guangya Liu wrote:
> > docs/quota.md, lines 306-310
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/42040/diff/2/?file=1187349#file1187349line306>
> >
> >     1) what about adding "update Quota" here and remove it from L189
> >     2) no Quota Limit but only guarantee
> >     
> >     Another point is that shall we put quota design document link here to 
> > naviagte someone there if they want to get some design detail for Quota?
> 
> Joerg Schad wrote:
>     1) Added it here (brief) with a link to L189. 
>     2) As we do not mention Quota Limits above, I would also not mention it 
> here (see our current definition of quota).
> 
> Guangya Liu wrote:
>     OK

Let's not mention the design doc in user docs. The proper place for a design 
doc is apache confluence. Updating, cleaning up, and moving the design doc to 
Confluence is on my list. I would suggest we do not block this review because 
of that.


- Alexander


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42040/#review113601
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 8, 2016, 10:26 a.m., Joerg Schad wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/42040/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 8, 2016, 10:26 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov, Bernd Mathiske, Joris Van 
> Remoortere, and Neil Conway.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3877
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3877
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added Quota Operator Documentation.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/home.md 6f0f4b9cb9d0da1f9960ebe7f36ce186c1317535 
>   docs/quota.md PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42040/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Rendered version: https://gist.github.com/joerg84/a2c32e25d91e33045b56
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joerg Schad
> 
>

Reply via email to