It seems unfortunate to introduce alternative looping constructs, for
example the following would be the more composable approach:

foreach (int i, reversed(numbers)) {

}

I remember this coming up before:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mesos-dev/201410.mbox/%3c20141002211204.18846.48...@reviews.apache.org%3E

Thoughts?

On Saturday, January 16, 2016, Jie Yu <yujie....@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/42379/#review114871
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Ship it!
>
>
>
> 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/foreach.hpp (lines 55 -
> 58)
> <https://reviews.apache.org/r/42379/#comment175706>
>
>     Ca you move this below 'foreachvalue'?
>
>
> - Jie Yu
>
>
> On Jan. 16, 2016, 1:32 a.m., Timothy Chen wrote:
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/42379/
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > (Updated Jan. 16, 2016, 1:32 a.m.)
> >
> >
> > Review request for mesos and Jie Yu.
> >
> >
> > Repository: mesos
> >
> >
> > Description
> > -------
> >
> > Add reverse_foreach in libprocess.
> >
> >
> > Diffs
> > -----
> >
> >   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/foreach.hpp
> 7fb0044790ee249b69e07b81a26851bd5bfb110f
> >
> > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42379/diff/
> >
> >
> > Testing
> > -------
> >
> > make check
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Timothy Chen
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to