-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42140/#review115001
-----------------------------------------------------------


Patch looks great!

Reviews applied: [40539, 37999, 38000, 38094, 38950, 39043, 42027, 42143, 
42144, 42140]

Passed command: export OS=ubuntu:14.04;export CONFIGURATION="--verbose";export 
COMPILER=gcc; ./support/docker_build.sh

- Mesos ReviewBot


On Jan. 18, 2016, 10:53 a.m., Alexander Rojas wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/42140/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 18, 2016, 10:53 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Bannier, Ben Mahler, Jan Schlicht, and 
> Till Toenshoff.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3933 and MESOS-4305
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3933
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4305
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The constructor of `process::http::Unauthorized(const std::string&)` is 
> marked as deprecated. This patch fully removes the constructor and cleans up 
> its usage in the Mesos codebase.
> 
> This change also allows to use initializer lists on the 
> `process::http::Unauthorized(const std::vector<std::string>&)` constructor 
> since there is no longer an ambiguity.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/http_authentication_tests.cpp 
> 3d6da53b8d6b4f0d3e5631a1855983583c0ae7dc 
>   src/tests/master_quota_tests.cpp e8cb074c2913cafdc6b1792896f29e53f1210c9d 
>   src/tests/persistent_volume_endpoints_tests.cpp 
> f0cce190abc90f0fae84d6c3db20e8215c2d8132 
>   src/tests/reservation_endpoints_tests.cpp 
> b8edd6fafedd4c2221a8d19c1ebc71254071a8c7 
>   src/tests/teardown_tests.cpp 97cc89ba168aefff8512f6d1a25c4f7ddf180bae 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42140/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rojas
> 
>

Reply via email to