> On 一月 19, 2016, 1:25 p.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote:
> > include/mesos/mesos.proto, line 1121
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/39845/diff/1/?file=1113968#file1113968line1121>
> >
> >     To Vinod's point; can we reuse the preempted status?
> >     
> >     'Resource oversubscribed' seems a bit counter intuitive as a error 
> > message, as that is what you tried to do in the first place :)

Reuse which one? What about adding REASON_RESOURCES_PREEMPTED?


- Guangya


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/39845/#review115153
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 一月 19, 2016, 10:39 a.m., Guangya Liu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/39845/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 一月 19, 2016, 10:39 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Niklas Nielsen and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2647
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2647
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added REASON_RESOURCE_OVERSUBSCRIBED to mesos proto.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/mesos.proto 94004343ea615d87d7c7d63a6a81aaaa1cf8002e 
>   include/mesos/v1/mesos.proto 8131778fe5c5f3a47ae9300a811e3d857a22da6a 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39845/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Guangya Liu
> 
>

Reply via email to